|
ASK
MARCY(Free legal advice!)
The
Ask Marcy column is intended to aid you and should not be considered
legal counsel. Please contact an attorney before conducting any
business venture - You may e-mail general music related legal
questions to
AskMarcy@UrbanBeatMovement.com
What does "Power of Attorney" mean in a management contract?
"Power Of Attorney" sounds frightful,
and it can be. It means that you are expressly (i.e., in writing)
allowing another person to sign agreements on your behalf under
certain limited circumstances that will be enumerated in either
a document called a "Power of Attorney" or a provision
in a contract that gives that person the power of attorney (or makes
them your"attorney-in-fact").
Let's look at what that means in the context
of a management agreement. Generally, a personal manager is
requesting that you, the artist, allow her to sign certain contracts
on your behalf in the event that you are unavailable to do so (like,
you're on the road or in the studio recording). Even though the
manager may want the right to enter into all sorts of agreements
on your behalf, there are obviously certain agreements where this
is inappropriate --principally, long-term agreements, such as recording
contracts and music publishing agreements. On the other hand, should
a contract for additional concert dates be received by the manager
when an artist is on tour and unavailable, it may be to your advantage
to permit the manager to execute (i.e., sign) the contract on your
behalf. So, let's say that David Letterman calls your manager and,
because Jay Z got the flu, Letterman wants you to appear that night
on his show instead. Letterman will fly you out first class. You're
on the tour bus in Abilene, TX, but Letterman's people need to have
their "live appearance contract" signed within 1/2 hour,
or you're OUT. In this type of scenario, and others like it, it's
a good idea for your manager to have a Power of Attorney to be able
to sign Letterman's contract for you. Generally, the Power of Attorney
should be limited to certain necessary scenarios.
The following is an example of how a "all-inclusive"
Power of Attorney clause might read in a Management Agreement:
"During the Term of this Agreement,
Manager is irrevocably appointed by Artist as Artist's true and
lawful attorney-in-fact to sign, make, execute and deliver in Artist's
name, documents and contracts for Artist's services, talents and/or
artistic, literary and musical materials (provided, however, that
in no event shall Manager execute on Artist's behalf any agreements
relating to Artist's exclusive songwriting or recording services)
only if Artist is not reasonably available to do so (unless Artist
waives this condition in any particular instance) and only with
Artist's prior consent in each instance, which shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
Or, you could see a provision like this:
"I hereby authorize Manager to execute
for me in my name and/or on my behalf routine "one-night'"
AFof M (American Federation of Musicians) agreements for live performances
by me in the continental United States, provided that such agreements
are identical to the form already signed in the past by me for such
performances and only if I am consistently unavailable to execute
such agreements ("unavailability" as used herein means
that Manager diligently but unsuccessfully endeavored to have me
execute such agreements)."
Or, the watered-down version of the above
could simply read like this: "Manager's power of attorney
shall be expressly limited to live appearance/performance "one-nighters";
or a series of live appearance/performance "one-nighters".
"
Or, WATCH OUT...it could contain a term
like this: "I hereby authorize Manager to collect and receive
sums as well as endorse my name to all checks payable to me for
my services, talents and literary and artistic materials and retain
therefrom all sums owed to Manager."
In the above provision, you are giving the
Manager the right to endorse your checks, take the money from the
checks and retain her commission without going through you. Unless
you have supreme confidence in this person and she is your business
manager, you should be wary of this type of provision! Many managers
may ask for this right, however, so be aware.
So, how do you protect yourself from such
a provision? Take a look at the following and make sure at least
something like this is in your management agreement:
"Other than as expressly stated in this
agreement, you are neither authorized nor permitted to execute any
agreements on my behalf except when you are expressly authorized
in writing to do so by me. Furthermore, you are neither authorized
nor permitted to collect or receive any monies or other considerations
for me or endorse checks or other negotiable instruments payable
to me or on my behalf."
There you go! The point is that how much
or how little power, or rights, you give to your Manager is up to
you. And, you know the old saying.... "Less is more".
Well, more for YOU, anyway.
.
If I own a copyright, why should I worry about publishing. Won't
I still get paid if someone tries to steals my song?
Short answer: No. No, you won't get
paid if someone steals your song and uses it without your permission.
That's the point of stealing it - to use it and not pay anyone!
But you didn't think you'd get away with a short answer, now did
you?
Long answer: You should ALWAYS register your song for copyright
with the Copyright Office in the Library of Congress or else you
cannot sue that guy who just stole your song and get paid! And,
without registration, you are not entitled to take advantage of
what I'm about to describe to you below, called the "compulsory
mechanical license"!
Now, let's be clear about a few things: 1) if some person "covers"
your song, i.e., re-records your already-released song, and doesn't
tell you, that's NOT considered stealing - all this person has to
do is account to you for an amount of money called your "statutory
mechanical royalties" mandated by the Copyright Act, which
as of this writing is 8.55 cents per song per CD distributed (meaning:
sold or leased or other transfer of ownership - yes, that means
"given away"). This is because, under the Copyright Act
(let's call it the Act from here on out), there is something called
a "compulsory mechanical license" which permits ANYONE
to record and distribute your song once you have published it, i.e.,
distributed it yourself without your permission - this was instituted
to prevent publishers (yes, you) from having a monopoly on their
songs. In other words, you lose your exclusivity on your right of
distribution once you have released that song to the public. That's
OK, though, because the Act provides that that person who re-records
it has to pay you the above-stated amount. If they do not do so,
they can be sued for infringement.
Now, onto 2): let's say an artist took the
chorus of your song, wrote new verses, released the new song as
completely his own, and the new song was played on the radio. Now,
THAT the artist CANNOT do without written permission from you. Why?
Because taking a portion of one person's copyrighted song and using
it in a new song without the first person's permission does not
fall under the "compulsory mechanical license" provision
- that new song combining your old stuff and his new stuff is considered
a "derivative work" - a work that has been adapted from,
or has transformed, another original work. No can do without written
permission! Therefore, voila, copyright infringement! And no payment!
Now, let's take this one step further: Remember
I mentioned that this new adapted "derivative work" was
played on the radio? You get money from that airplay from your performing
rights society (PRO) like ASCAP, BMI or SESAC because their job
is to track the number of times your song plays on the radio and
pay you for it. Do you think that nice thieving artist gave his
new song the same name as your original song and then was kind enough
to register the new song in both your names with his PRO so you
can receive your legitimate share of public performance royalties
for airplay of that new song? Nope. So, you won't receive anything
from your PRO because they will never know it's your chorus in his
new song!
In other words, when all is said and done, if someone really steals
your song you have to sue them to get paid, 'cause they're doing
it cause they don't want to pay you! See? It's hard enough to get
paid, frankly, even when they're NOT stealing your song. That's
why the Lord created entertainment lawyers.
What
is BDS encoding and what is its purpose?
BDS
stands for Broadcast Data Systems. It is a company that tracks and
monitors radio airplay of songs on over one thousand radio stations
across the country and such tracking is used to determine chart
positions in radio reporting magazines, etc. Billboard uses BDS
for the airplay portion of their music charts. BDS tracks over 1
million songs per week. It also monitors stations in Canada and
Puerto Rico. Users of the information provided by BDS are: record
labels, radio programmers, artist managers, music supervisors for
movies, publishers, music licensing companies, retail store managers,
independent promoters, publicists - virtually every music industry
professional can find BDS's monitoring information useful to some
degree. It also monitors song airplay for ASCAP and SESAC, which
gives those performing rights societies a bigger sampling picture
on who is playing what song and when, and subsequently, allows their
songwriter/publisher members to reap more performance royalties.
BDS's parent company, VNU, operates in Europe as well for monitoring
airplay for royalty tracking purposes. BDS also works hand-in-hand
with SoundScan (the organization that tracks CD sales at the retail
level). If you want your song to be tracked it must be encoded with
BDS encoding system. i.e., "fingerprint" - you can send
your material to BDS.... for a price, of course! for more info :
http://www.bdsonline.com/bds/bds.shtml
Clearing
and using samples
Clearing
samples is a long and lonely process if you do it yourself; however,
there are sample clearing houses (see list below) which, for a price,
will clear the samples for you. It can be costly, however, so here's
how you can do it yourself
Samples
generally consist of two (2) distinct elements that can be copyrighted:
1- the sound recording (which consists of the ACTUAL FIXED
SOUNDS that appear on the recording); and
2 -the underlying musical composition (i.e., the words and
music of the song).
In
order to legally use the sample, you MUST get permission from the
copyright owners of the both the sound recording AND the song itself.
Often, the copyright owners of these two elements are NOT the same
person or entity. In the majority of cases, the sound recording
copyright owner is the record label and the song copyright owner
can either be the recording artist, a songwriter from whom the recording
artist got the song, and/or a publishing company.
So, what do you do?
First,
determine who are the owners of these two copyrightable elements.
Part
One:
Let's say you need to clear a sample of a Beanie Sigel record. You
must call Roc-A-Fella Records and tell them you need to clear a
sample of the sound recording. They will connect you with the licensing
division. There, you will negotiate a price with the label to get
a license (permission) to use the sampled sound recording.
Your price will be determined by a number of factors - for example:
1-how much of the sound recording is being used?
2-how many times does the sample appear in your new song/recording,
just once or twice, or throughout?
3-is the sample a fundamental part of the song, i.e., is it intrinsic
and necessary to the integrity of your new song/recording?
4-how popular is the sound recording that you wish to sample?
5-how popular is the artist who made the sound recording?
BE
AWARE: After you negotiate
the price for the sound recording license, the record label may
request, or insist upon, partial, or complete, copyright ownership
in your new sound recording as well. If you refuse, then the record
label is completely within its rights to deny you usage of their
copyrighted sound recording.
BE
AWARE II: Dont think that just because you are
sampling a Beethoven record, youre in the clear after
all, hes been dead a long, long time and his music is in the
public domain (which means its up for grabs from anyone who wishes
to use it). BUT - Someone owns the sound recording of that Beethoven
record youre sampling, and you STILL need to get permission
to use it!
BE
AWARE III: How do you get around paying for the sound
recording license? Easy. If you are able to do so, you may identically
reproduce those actual sounds that you wish to sample yourself and
make your own, separate sound recording. Then, YOU own that new
sound recording, and you can legally sample your own sound recording,
of course. But you still must complete Part Two
..
Part
Two:
Next, you must find the copyright owners of the actual song itself.
You may be able to determine who the owner/publisher is from the
CD label containing the song you wish to sample, but, generally,
the CD label doesnt have the publishers contact info.
So, your best move is to call the Harry Fox Agency (HFA) in NYC.
HFA issues mechanical licenses to people who want to cover copyrighted
songs. They have a HUGE database of publishers, so there is a good
chance they will not only be able to tell you who the copyright
owner is, but also, they can issue you a mechanical license for
the song. This mechanical license allows you to reproduce and distribute
the song, and sets the payment rate for such usage. The current
rate that you must pay the copyright owner is eight cents (8¢)
per song per CD distributed, but that rate will increase in January,
2004. Go to www.harryfox.com
for lots more information and online mechanical license forms. If
you cannot find the owners via Harry Fox, try ASCAP, BMI and SESAC
online databases.
The
good news with THIS part of your clearance expedition is this:
unlike in the case of the record label, the songs copyright
owner CANNOT stop you from covering the song in your new song/sound
recording; under the Copyright Act, once a song has been distributed
to the public, anyone is free to cover that song. Your only responsibility
is payment to the songs copyright owner of that eight cents
per song per CD (see above). The not-so-bad news is: you
cannot get around this one
you must get a mechanical license
for the song itself.
There
you go! Sample, I mean, simple, huh? OK, stop groaning and call
a sample clearance house! Heres a list I obtained in one minute
on the Internet (but I cannot personally vouch for any of them):
BZ/
Rights and Permissions Inc.
125 W. 72nd St., New York, NY 10023
212-580-0651
Contact: Barbara Zimmerman, President
Clearance
Consultants
10669 Santa Monica Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90025
310-441-2600
Contact: Jeanne Fay and Jody Silverman
Copyright
Clearinghouse,Inc.
405 Riverside Drive
Burbank, CA 91506
Phone: 818-558-3480
Fax: 818-558-3474
Contact: Anita Hunsaker, Vice President,
Ron Gertz, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Copyright
Music and Visuals
67 Portland St., 1st Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5V 2M9
416-979-3333
Contact: John R. Ciccone, President
Diamond
Time LTD.
73 Spring st., Suite 504, New York,NY 10012
212-274-1006
Contact: Cathy Carapella, Vice President of Operation
Essex
Entertainment Inc.
144 2nd Ave. North, Suite 150, Nashville, TN 37201
615-244-9305
Contact: Cheryl Melton
Evan
M. Greenspan Inc.
11846 Ventura Blvd., Suite 140, Studio City, CA 91604
818-762-9656
Contact: Evan Greenspan, President
Media
Rights Inc.
6100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1500, Los Angeles, CA 90048
213-954-0181
Contacts: Melody Siroty, President
Scott Cruchley, Vice President
Diane
Prentice MusicClearance Inc.
8720 Woodley Ave., Suite 232, North Hills, CA 91343
818-830-1270
Contact: Diane Prentice, Vice President
SIGNATURE
SOUND, INC.
71 West 23rd Street
New York, NY 10010
Phone: 212 989-0011
Fax: 212 989-3576
Elliot Schrager, President
Dorothy Krantz, Executive VP
Sound
Thinking
1534 N. Moorpark Rd., Suite 333, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
805-495-3306 (phone and fax)
Contact: Cary Ginell
What
is Publishing and why is it so important?
I
teach a ten week course on the publishing industry, so I'll try
to boil it down here to a few key concepts:
Publishing is the exploitation (in a GOOD way) of musical compositions
to music users of all types, e.g., recording artists who need songs
for their LPs, movie and TV producers or music supervisors who need
songs for soundtrack uses, ad agencies who need music/songs for
radio and TV advertising uses, sheet music uses.
The publishing industry is the "cash cow" of the music
industry. Why? Because there are so many revenue streams that
flow from song ownership and the ability to license musical compositions
(a license gives some one or some entity the right to use your musical
composition under certain terms and conditions).
Publishers are the owners of either some
or all of the exclusive rights given to copyright owners under the
Copyright Act.
They are: the right of distribution (sale, lease or other
transfer of ownership); the right to publicly perform the work
(radio/TV airplay, for example); the right to create a derivative
work (adapt, transform or recast the original work); the
right to reproduce the work (e.g., make copies for sale); and
the right to digitally publicly perform the work (e.g., stream
over the Internet). So, for each right comes a concomitant revenue
stream.
The following are some examples, but there are more than these.........
DISTRIBUTION and REPRODUCTION:
Under the Copyright Act, if a recording artist records a certain
song on her new LP, the publisher of that song will receive (as
of this writing) 8 cents per song per CD distributed (i.e., sold).
This is known as a "mechanical royalty". So, if the artist
distributes 500,000 CDs with that song on it, the publisher will
receive $40,000 in mechanical royalties for that one song.
PUBLIC PERFORMANCE: Also, let's
say that song is played on radio stations all across the country.
Then, the publisher receives royalties for that type of airplay
through either ASCAP, BMI or SESAC - these are performing rights
societies that collect the publisher's monies received from the
song's airplay and pass those monies on to their writer and publisher
members.
Let's move on further....because the song has reached some notoriety
by appearing on a gold record and getting significant radio airplay,
a music supervisor for the new Jackie Chan flick wants to use this
song in the movie. The publisher will negotiate a "synchronization
license" with the music supervisor which means that the music
supervisor will pay the publisher a synchronization licensing fee
for allowing the music supervisor to use the song "in synchronization
with" the visual - the movie.
The new Jackie Chan flick comes out - it's a huge success. It's
publicly performed (played) in movie theatres all over the world.
The publisher then receives, in addition to the above-stated sychronization
licensing fee, the synchronization public performance royalties
(i.e., "synch royalties") for overseas theatrical performances
of the song in the movie. Then, when HBO and Cinemax and CBS broadcast
the movie, the publisher will receive 'synch royalties' for those
TV performances as well. And, lo and behold, Ford absolutely has
to have this hit song for all those new Ford Humungus SUV commercials
- once again, the publisher will negotiate a synch license with
the ad agency, get a fee, and once again, the publisher will reap
synch royalties as a result of the Ford ads being played over and
over again on TV. Also, by the way, the recording artist plays the
song live on Jay Leno and the Today Show - more public performance
income! And it's dowloaded from iTunes, and streamed over hundreds
of Internet radio stations, and....well, you get the picture.
DERIVATIVE WORK: P. Diddy wants
to use Sting's song "Every Breath You Take"
and change the lyrics to create a new, derivative work entitled
"I'll Be Missin' You". Let's say Sting is the publisher
of "Every Breath You Take". P. Diddy gets permission from
Sting to do this - but Sting winds up owning the copyright on the
new, derivative song "I'll Be Missing You" as well. Lots
of money for Sting!
Sometimes,
the songwriter and the publisher are one and the same; other times,
the original songwriter may transfer some or all of his or her copyrights
to a music publishing company. So, why go with a publisher? It depends
on how much time and effort an individual songwriter can spend on
properly exploiting (remember, in publishing that's a GOOD word)
his or her songs. Also, it may be hard to collect and keep track
of all the revenue streams created by a writer's hit song. Another
key publishing function is administration: a publishing company
collects the money, keeps the books, goes after copyright infringers,
negotiates licenses, and does myriad other administrative functions
to maximize income on a musical composition.
Ah, but this is a discussion for another day..........
Can I copyright songs over the Internet?
As
of the date of this writing, you cannot copyright songs or sound
recordings over the Internet. You can, however, either fill in the
SR and PA forms online and then print them out (please use a laser
printer and good quality paper), or download (in .pdf) those forms
with instructions on how to properly fill them out. You must send
the Copyright Office a check in the amount of $30.00 along with
EACH application and a copy or copies of your work(s).
Go to: www.copyright.gov/forms/
for the forms.
Note:
you will download the forms as individual pages - then, you should
copy the forms to "two-sided" format, i.e., page should
appear as the other side of page one instead of submitting page
one and page two as two separate pages.
Note:
Your effective date of registration is the date upon which the Copyright
Office receives your completed application and your $30.00 fee along
with your copy or copies of the works to be registered for copyright.
This date is very important to you. Therefore, you should send each
application for registration certified mail, return receipt request.
That way, when you get the signed green card back, you will have
a record of the date your application was received in the Copyright
Office.
Is it possible to copyright multiple songs on one copyright form?
You may register the copyright in more than
one song at a time using the Form PA (for "Performing Arts").
If you do so, copyright them as a "collection" NOT a "compilation".
Five
Requirements Must Be Satisfied to copyright a collection:
1.
THE SONGS MUST BE UNPUBLISHED. In other words, they must not have
been offered to the public for sale.
2.
THE SAME PARTY MUST OWN ALL RIGHTS IN THE SONGS AND IN THE COLLECTION
AS A WHOLE. This means that you have not signed over one or more
of your copyright rights to another person or entity.
3.
THE SONGS you are registering MUST BE BY THE SAME AUTHOR OR AT LEAST
ONE AUTHOR MUST BE COMMON TO EACH WORK. So, as long as you are at
least the co-author of each of the works being registered, you may
register the songs as a collection.
4.
SONGS MUST BE ASSEMBLED IN AN ORDERLY FORM (on CD or cassette, specify
the number of songs and put titles in order that the songs appear
on the CD).
5.
SONGS MUST BE IDENTIFIED BY A SINGLE TITLE , e.g., "Marcy's
Greatest Hits of 2003 Volume 1".
If so, how can you sell one song without selling the whole group
of songs?
Registering
your songs as a collection will still allow you to license one individual
song on the collection to any type of music user (e.g., movie, TV
show, recording artist). The main difference in registering songs
individually and registering a collection of songs lies in the way
the songs are indexed in the Library of Congress. Only the title
is registered in the Copyright Office if you copyright your songs
as a collection.
So, how do you prevent the problem of someone searching for your
song and NOT finding it? Well, after you receive your registration
for the collection, file a FORM CA listing the individual titles
of songs contained in the collection - it's still less costly to
do this than to register each song individually if you have more
than four songs. (It's $65.00 for FORM CA). The FORM CA will amend
your original registration.
Is
sending my songs in the mail to myself an acceptable alternative
to copyrighting my material? (why or why not)
You
can do that, but all that does is show alternate proof that you
wrote that song at that particular time. Understand that you are
'copyrighted' as soon as you put pen to paper or voice to tape...however,
you don't get the benefits of the Copyright Act if you don't register...i.e.,
You cannot sue for infringement under the copyright law if you do
not register. The conclusive proof is registration, so it does SOME
good to mail yourself your song, but not much. If someone else has
sent in a copyright registration on the song you mailed to yourself,
his registration trumps your mailed song, and you have to prove
fraud, which is very hard to do
.and costly.
If
I'm in a group and we sign a contract, if we change our name, can
we get out of the contract?
Generally,
no, if you change your name you cannot get out of a contract that
you signed under a band name, because most contracts join to the
contract band members individually AS WELL AS the band as a whole
(most of the time, the contract actually says that). In any case,
in all likelihood there is no judge in the USA who will let you
out of a contract just because you changed the name of the band....can
you imagine how easy that would make it for bands that later on
decided they didn't want to fulfill the contract?
Marcy
Rauer Wagman
The
Law Offices of Marcy Rauer Wagman, Esq.
300 East Lancaster Avenue
Suite 106A Wynnewood, PA 19096
Phone: 610-645-9960 -or- 215-895-1923 Fax: 610-525-0479
|
|